33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives in the police is to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and above all, assure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
If your DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and carry on according on the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts until eventually or Except either new legislation is created, or possibly a higher court rules differently.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement in the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement on the laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis
From the United States, persons are not required to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their possess can remember 1 rule of thumb when it concerns referring to case law or precedent in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only on the case, but to your section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents on the boy or girl tend not to approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they might Lower off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats canadian case law database or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by legislation.
The DCFS social worker in charge of your boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report for the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Bearing on the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 in the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition is usually dismissed. This is because service of the grievance notice is actually a mandatory necessity as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation involves that a grievance notice be served about the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) When the organization is transprovincial.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety days. In the event the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then technique the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 days with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided through the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
ten. Based within the findings in the inquiry committee, this petition will not be considered maintainable and is also therefore liable being dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
As being the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners could seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more